|
"For High Tech, Getting Workers Is Now a Crisis"
American University Washington College of Law
Business Law Brief, Volume 4, Issue 1, Fall 2007
by William T. Archey and
Josh James, AeA
Very few Members of Congress
seem to understand one of the less talked about but equally portentous
consequences of the recent death of the immigration bill: it has put the
high-tech industry into a crisis by continuing to deny it the ability to attract
the best and brightest talent from around the world.
The issue of high skilled,
legal immigration, which allows companies to bring highly educated workers to
the United States on temporary H-1B visas or permanent employment-based green
cards, received little media attention. But in terms of American economic and
technological prowess, it will have a huge impact. Nobody on Capitol Hill seems
to get this.
The failure of Congress to
act on high skilled immigration means that companies will not have access to the
qualified workers they need and some will be forced to move offshore – not
because the labor is cheaper, not because the market is bigger, but because that
is where the talent is.
Since the Sputnik crisis –
the 50th anniversary of which is October 4th of this year
– America has been the beneficiary of being able to attract the best minds in
the world to come work in the United States. 9/11 slowed that flow
dramatically. It also slowed the creation of jobs and wealth that foreign-born
scientists and engineers spawned over the last 50 years.
The inability to obtain
these visas is compounded by a simple fact. Fewer American kids are choosing
engineering as a major. U.S. universities awarded 79,700 bachelors degrees in
engineering in 2005, down 22 percent from a high of 97,100 in 1986, according to
the Department of Education. For graduate engineering degrees, Americans
receive only 54 percent of all masters and 40 percent of all doctorates
awarded. The rest go to foreign nationals, and without visas waiting for them
upon graduation, they have to leave the country.
Let’s look at the other
data:
·
The U.S. high-tech industry lost
over a million net jobs between 2000 and 2004. But between 2004 and 2006 the
industry added 250,000 net new jobs. This job growth would have been
substantially higher if qualified individuals, American or foreign-born, were
available.
·
The official U.S. unemployment rate
for all engineers in 2006 was 1.8 percent; for electrical engineers it was 1.9
percent.
·
The fourth most difficult job
category for employers to fill is engineers, according to Manpower’s Annual
Talent Shortage Survey.
·
In 2006, the average high-tech wage
was 86 percent higher than the rest of the private sector. In some states,
including California, the differential was over 100 percent.
·
Since 1995, one of every four U.S.
high-tech companies was established by at least one foreign-born co-founder.
One argument against
increasing the cap on H-1B visas is that tech companies hire foreign workers on
the cheap and depress wages. But as the 86 percent wage differential attests,
high tech pays people very well. Have some companies abused the system? Yes.
These companies, many of them foreign-owned, do try to use the H-1B program to
hire cheaper labor. Though these companies are the exception rather than the
rule, they clearly have abused the system and should be punished. The tech
industry fully supports enforcement provisions that go after abusers of the
system.
The overwhelming majority of
companies pay H-1B workers the prevailing wage. As one senior executive of a
large high-tech company stated: “Do you think I could get away with paying below
the prevailing wage? These guys are sharp. They know exactly what they’re
worth.”
Even the IEEE, an
association of engineers that argues against allowing in more foreign nationals,
may be seeing the light. A commentary on the IEEE Spectrum website, in response
to the recent tech industry job growth, remarked: “It's high time for all the
hand wringing to end and for those involved in preparing a new generation of
engineers and scientists to fill the job openings that are being offered now by
this welcome rejuvenation in the U.S. electronics industry.”
Despite this brave new world
of globalization, American tech companies remain just that: American. They do
not relish the idea of moving operations out of the United States. They would
much rather hire an American worker or bring a foreign-born worker here to
become part of the culture of an American company, creating high paying jobs,
wealth, and intellectual property in the United States instead of in a foreign
country.
If our lawmakers are serious
about keeping a vibrant tech industry on American shores, with everything that
engenders, then Congress cannot let this legislative year pass without taking
action on legal, high-skilled immigration.

WILLIAM T. ARCHEY is
President and CEO of AeA, the nation’s largest technology trade association with
2,500 member companies representing all segments of the high-tech industry.
JOSH JAMES is the Senior
Research Manager at AeA.
|